You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Richard [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.41pm, Monday, 12th January 2009]
This ticket is handily placed here so that the massed readers of talk[at]openstreetmap.org can say which thicknesses work, and which don't, at different scales of Potlatch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: 25or6to4 [Added to the original trac issue at 8.26pm, Monday, 12th January 2009]
I normally do editing from zooms 17 to 20, and prefer using the thin lines. The only problem I've had is sensitivity of the lines; if I'm aiming for a thin line but miss and click the pixel next to the line, it will instead start a new line.
Author: Richard [Added to the original trac issue at 10.39am, Wednesday, 14th January 2009]
Should be possible, but at a significant performance cost: Flash performance is poor for anything where _alpha!=100, you'd have the additional cost of redrawing these lines each time, and you might be probably talking an extra movie clip for each line which involves a memory overhead too. I can experiment but I'd rather not have to rely on it.
Reporter: Richard
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.41pm, Monday, 12th January 2009]
This ticket is handily placed here so that the massed readers of talk[at]openstreetmap.org can say which thicknesses work, and which don't, at different scales of Potlatch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: