Author: steve8[at]mdx.ac.uk
[Added to the original trac issue at 7.58pm, Friday, 3rd April 2009]

Done in latest revision. Awaiting deployment of the style by JonB.

Author: rasher
[Added to the original trac issue at 8.48pm, Thursday, 17th September 2009]

Is that really such a good idea?

I know that the wiki isn't the end-all be-all, but fwiw, it seems to suggest that a leisure=marina should be applied to the area of land that belongs with the marina (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Harbour#Harbour_as_an_area). I did this, and ended up with piers, restaurants and parking areas, seemingly in the sea - http://osm.org/go/0H8VI6vZf-.

At any rate, rendering it in the exact same colour as the sea seems silly, even if you maintain that it should be the area of water belonging with the marina - why not colour it slightly lighter/darker then, to show it?

Either way, I don't think the current situation makes much sense.

Author: rasher
[Added to the original trac issue at 2.24am, Sunday, 21st March 2010]

leisure=marina areas now render with transparent fill and a dashed dark blue outline. This means that it may be used for both sea and land areas (or perhaps even better - both at the same time). This seems to be a good compromise.