Author: tom[at]compton.nu
[Added to the original trac issue at 2.36pm, Thursday, 4th June 2009]

Please don't put multiple problems on one ticket - it makes the ticket impossible to close.

As far as layers goes, as soon as somebody gives me a key for one of the other layers I can start displaying it. To date only the creators of the mapnik layer have bothered to do this.

As far as translation goes, we are aware that this is an issue but there is no easy solution at the moment as the key is an image.

Author: avarab[at]gmail.com
[Added to the original trac issue at 12.22pm, Tuesday, 23rd June 2009]

Fixed in changeset [16073] and [16074].

Author: tom[at]compton.nu
[Added to the original trac issue at 8.28pm, Tuesday, 23rd June 2009]

Did you do what I repeatedly asked and talk to Jon Burgess and/or Steve8 before making this change?

Author: tom[at]compton.nu
[Added to the original trac issue at 8.29pm, Tuesday, 23rd June 2009]

Having just looked at what you committed, it is clearly completely insane so will not be being deployed in it's current state.

Author: avarab[at]gmail.com
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.15pm, Tuesday, 23rd June 2009]

Replying to [comment:5 tom[at]compton.nu]:

Did you do what I repeatedly asked and talk to Jon Burgess and/or Steve8 before making this change?

I asked Jon Burgess what he thought and he doesn't think he's the best person to offer advice about the style of implementation of features in the railsport.

Having just looked at what you committed, it is clearly completely insane so will not be being deployed in it's current state.

What about it is insane? Dynamically generating HTML with JavaScript? The feature already depends on JS. And the load of serving individual PNG files is negligable as they will be cached on the browser side.

But maybe you have completely different objections. So it would help to get specific objections in the first place and not have to speculate as to what it is that you mean. Mindreading is not one of my many talents.