Streams looks strange on riverbanks #3468
Comments
Author: osm[at]heesakkers.info http://trac.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24983/applications/rendering/mapnik/inc/layer-water.xml.inc |
Author: xificurk Btw, the same goes for reservoirs and other water areas. |
Author: kyblicek[at]kyblsoft.cz I wrote patch to fix it - it simply move all water lines under water areas. (Is there any case in which is desired to have any line on water area?) |
Author: Ldp Yes, where one waterway tunnels under another (area). I had another solution in mind, but didn't get around to it yet. I'll try to get to it this week. |
Author: osm[at]heesakkers.info The best options IMO would be to have rivers render their name, so that you don't have to "abuse" the stream tag to render names on rivers. The case of the ticketstarter would then be fixed by having the stream run up to but not in to the water-mass. [http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2514 Ticket on rendering river names] |
Author: Ldp One of the reasons the stream runs into the water mass is due to possible future waterway routing, as I understood it. |
Author: osm[at]heesakkers.info Make the part in the water-mass a river, that wouldn't break routing, would it? It is a bit [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.382847&lon=5.396838&zoom=18&layers=M hard to aim], I have to admit that. |
Author: Ldp Fixed and deployed in r25563. |
Reporter: Zverik
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.54am, Monday, 17th January 2011]
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=57.79794&lon=28.32351&zoom=16&layers=M
Look at where the stream connects to the river inside riverbank. Streams now seem to have contour which is ok on land, but should be hidden under water. Probably riverbanks should be drawn over all other waterways.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: