You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: flaimo [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.43pm, Friday, 25th March 2011]
amenity=school should be used only for the actual facilities. but fellow mappers use it as a substitute for landuse, because it renders nicely in a yellowish color. the problem is, that search results then show two schools (one for the building and one for the area), because there there is not enough data to differentiate between the landuse and the actual school. it gets even worse, when different schools share one estate.
therefore i suggest that landuse=education should be rendered in the same color like amenity=school on areas to give mappers an alternative for defining/coloring the landuse and at the same time solving the problem with too many search results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporter: flaimo
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.43pm, Friday, 25th March 2011]
amenity=school should be used only for the actual facilities. but fellow mappers use it as a substitute for landuse, because it renders nicely in a yellowish color. the problem is, that search results then show two schools (one for the building and one for the area), because there there is not enough data to differentiate between the landuse and the actual school. it gets even worse, when different schools share one estate.
therefore i suggest that landuse=education should be rendered in the same color like amenity=school on areas to give mappers an alternative for defining/coloring the landuse and at the same time solving the problem with too many search results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: