You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: jburgess[at]uklinux.net [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.21pm, Saturday, 17th February 2007]
There is a track near me which is often used as a cycle route although it is actually the route of a dismantled railway and is mostly loose earth or gravel. Currently I have tagged this with:
highway=unsurfaced
cycle=yes
foot=yes
horse=no
railway=abandoned
name=The Nickey Line
id=2734892
This combination of tags used to cause the track to get a distinctive colouring. Now at high zooms it looks like any of the nearby unclassified roads (plain white with black casing). Since it isn't a properly surfaced cycleway I don't want to tag as a proper cycleway, but I feel the track should appear distinctive on the map.
Feel free to suggest a different tagging if you feel appropriate.
Reporter: jburgess[at]uklinux.net
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.21pm, Saturday, 17th February 2007]
There is a track near me which is often used as a cycle route although it is actually the route of a dismantled railway and is mostly loose earth or gravel. Currently I have tagged this with:
highway=unsurfaced
cycle=yes
foot=yes
horse=no
railway=abandoned
name=The Nickey Line
id=2734892
This combination of tags used to cause the track to get a distinctive colouring. Now at high zooms it looks like any of the nearby unclassified roads (plain white with black casing). Since it isn't a properly surfaced cycleway I don't want to tag as a proper cycleway, but I feel the track should appear distinctive on the map.
Feel free to suggest a different tagging if you feel appropriate.
The track in question is named 'The Nickey Line' at http://www.openstreetmap.org/index.html?lat=51.77973035895138&lon=-0.4243405124705194&zoom=15
The current mapnik layer shows the old rendering with yellow dashed line, but the latest osm.xml has rules for highway=unsurfaced making it look like highway=unclassified.
Other web references describing this route and including a photo or two are at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Line
http://enquire.hertscc.gov.uk/cms/explore/walk/nickyline.htm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: