Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

unsurfaced and unclassified highways should be visibly differentiated on map #380

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: jburgess[at]uklinux.net
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.21pm, Saturday, 17th February 2007]

There is a track near me which is often used as a cycle route although it is actually the route of a dismantled railway and is mostly loose earth or gravel. Currently I have tagged this with:

  • highway=unsurfaced

  • cycle=yes

  • foot=yes

  • horse=no

  • railway=abandoned

  • name=The Nickey Line

  • id=2734892

This combination of tags used to cause the track to get a distinctive colouring. Now at high zooms it looks like any of the nearby unclassified roads (plain white with black casing). Since it isn't a properly surfaced cycleway I don't want to tag as a proper cycleway, but I feel the track should appear distinctive on the map.

Feel free to suggest a different tagging if you feel appropriate.

The track in question is named 'The Nickey Line' at http://www.openstreetmap.org/index.html?lat=51.77973035895138&lon=-0.4243405124705194&zoom=15
The current mapnik layer shows the old rendering with yellow dashed line, but the latest osm.xml has rules for highway=unsurfaced making it look like highway=unclassified.

Other web references describing this route and including a photo or two are at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Line
http://enquire.hertscc.gov.uk/cms/explore/walk/nickyline.htm

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: grand.edgemaster[at]gmail.com
[Added to the original trac issue at 4.16pm, Thursday, 4th October 2007]

Now appears to have been fixed - dashed casing.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant