You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Author: Richard [Added to the original trac issue at 11.52pm, Friday, 16th May 2008]
If someone can provide these images in a like-Google ('900913') tile format then we can offer them at the drop of a hat - it's a single-line change. Until then it won't happen - sorry.
Author: emj [Added to the original trac issue at 10.45am, Saturday, 17th May 2008]
Well landsat imagery is available in several different bandwidth,
spannig more than the visible, most notably the IR. So you can use
lots of techniques to make images look better, by merging them in
different ways.
I'm guessing OAM landsat is enhanced to a better resolution using
different tricks from the NASA one. (Or maybe the NASA landsat is just
scaled up with something better than just doubling pixels.
Reporter: erik[at]tiq.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 11.24pm, Friday, 16th May 2008]
I don't know how easy this would be but I'd like to see Nasa's Landsat images besides OpenAerial?'s as Nasa's seem to have better colours around here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: