You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: david[at]frankieandshadow.com [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.33pm, Sunday, 10th August 2008]
there's an odd discrepancy between type sizes for similarly tagged nodes and areas. For example, I did a named industrial estate as landuse=industrial and inside that I put a number of named nodes also tagged landuse=industrial to represent individual factories, and shows up pretty nicely on Mapnik, except that the name of the industrial estate (area) is considerably smaller than the node names. If anything I think these should be the other way round, but probably making them the same size would be best.
Reporter: david[at]frankieandshadow.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.33pm, Sunday, 10th August 2008]
there's an odd discrepancy between type sizes for similarly tagged nodes and areas. For example, I did a named industrial estate as landuse=industrial and inside that I put a number of named nodes also tagged landuse=industrial to represent individual factories, and shows up pretty nicely on Mapnik, except that the name of the industrial estate (area) is considerably smaller than the node names. If anything I think these should be the other way round, but probably making them the same size would be best.
See here for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.34629&lon=-0.1957&zoom=16&layers=B00FTFTTT (Ermin Business Park for the area, vs various of the names around it).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: