You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: cjb[at]cjb.ie [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 5.31pm, Monday, 26th December 2005]
Can we move the pan/zoom controls out of the HTML page and into the applet? Currently, pan/zoom causes an applet reload, which is slow and causes loss of context (tool currently selected, node display size setting, possibly more?)
It's hard to decide whether a pan/zoom mode like the slippy interface would be better (allows you to position the window exactly where you want it, but would mean having to deselect the current tool to enter pan/zoom mode), or arrow buttons like in the HTML page (which would leave the current tool selected, but give a much coarser degree of control).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: cjb[at]cjb.ie [Added to the original trac issue at 3.51pm, Monday, 9th January 2006]
I like the panning with shift-drag, and zoom with '[' and ']' - however, zooming seems to undo any panning done since the applet was started, that is to say, it doesn't operate on what you're currently looking at.
Reporter: cjb[at]cjb.ie
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 5.31pm, Monday, 26th December 2005]
Can we move the pan/zoom controls out of the HTML page and into the applet? Currently, pan/zoom causes an applet reload, which is slow and causes loss of context (tool currently selected, node display size setting, possibly more?)
It's hard to decide whether a pan/zoom mode like the slippy interface would be better (allows you to position the window exactly where you want it, but would mean having to deselect the current tool to enter pan/zoom mode), or arrow buttons like in the HTML page (which would leave the current tool selected, but give a much coarser degree of control).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: