Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

Osmarender ignores tunnel tag of stream and drain #1294

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Osmarender ignores tunnel tag of stream and drain #1294

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: nkbre
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.26pm, Friday, 24th October 2008]

But this small waterways often have covered sections. Please render stream and drain with tunnel=yes that they are there but not at the surface.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: osm[at]petschge.de
[Added to the original trac issue at 2.36pm, Friday, 24th October 2008]

Please add a link to a map where the problem can be seen.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: Astrofreak85
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.45am, Saturday, 25th October 2008]

Here:

The "Lnitzbach" between the tertiary street and the beginning of landuse=farm :
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=51.09512373974451&lon=13.658837144095925zoom=17&layers=B0000F000F

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: osm[at]petschge.de
[Added to the original trac issue at 12.41pm, Saturday, 25th October 2008]

Ok. The rendering lacks any clue that the stream is in a tunnel there. I think drawing a dashed blue line (same color, same width as a stream on the surface) would be good.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: osm[at]petschge.de
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.25pm, Thursday, 18th December 2008]

I made a patch, but it is not yet testes sufficiently.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: osm[at]petschge.de
[Added to the original trac issue at 2.30pm, Sunday, 28th December 2008]

Should be fixed as of r12637.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant