You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Author: steve8[at]mdx.ac.uk [Added to the original trac issue at 8.35pm, Sunday, 11th January 2009]
OK to do in theory, but mapnik does not respect "layer" as such. Needs to be explicitly filtered for. As it stands the tagging at LWC would not work for mapnik. First point is that areas that are at "ground level" should NOT really be tagged as layer 1 and layer 2. Secondly the areas within areas should be tagged as a multipolygon relation. I will have a look at the png and try it on another area sometime though.
Reporter: nigelbee
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.33pm, Sunday, 11th January 2009]
Areas such as the [http://www.wwt.org.uk/centre/119/visit/wetlandcentre/.html London Wetland Centre]:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.47877&lon=-0.23061&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
would look much more interesting and distinctive if marshes were rendered. This happens in the Osmarender layer but not currently in the Mapnik layer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: