You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Ed Avis [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.56am, Friday, 6th March 2009]
The openstreetmap.org search box gives some examples including 'Regent Street, Cambridge'. So I expected that searching for 'Long Lane, London' would return streets called Long Lane in or near places called London. However, it returns lots of results which do not match that:
Most of the result is for places and streets not called Long Lane but just something vaguely like it, and the real matches are mostly the last ones shown. A fuzzy match is sometimes useful but if used, the exact matches should appear at the top of the list.
Most of the results are not in any place called London.
Oddly, if you query just for 'long lane' then many of the same results are returned but the London streets seem to be missed out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporter: Ed Avis
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.56am, Friday, 6th March 2009]
The openstreetmap.org search box gives some examples including 'Regent Street, Cambridge'. So I expected that searching for 'Long Lane, London' would return streets called Long Lane in or near places called London. However, it returns lots of results which do not match that:
Most of the result is for places and streets not called Long Lane but just something vaguely like it, and the real matches are mostly the last ones shown. A fuzzy match is sometimes useful but if used, the exact matches should appear at the top of the list.
Most of the results are not in any place called London.
Oddly, if you query just for 'long lane' then many of the same results are returned but the London streets seem to be missed out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: