You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: fluteflute [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.21pm, Monday, 30th March 2009]
Areas tagged with leisure=marina are currently rendered with the same colour as land. Instead they should be rendered in a blue shade (probably the same shade as the sea).
At any rate, rendering it in the exact same colour as the sea seems silly, even if you maintain that it should be the area of water belonging with the marina - why not colour it slightly lighter/darker then, to show it?
Either way, I don't think the current situation makes much sense.
Author: rasher [Added to the original trac issue at 2.24am, Sunday, 21st March 2010]
leisure=marina areas now render with transparent fill and a dashed dark blue outline. This means that it may be used for both sea and land areas (or perhaps even better - both at the same time). This seems to be a good compromise.
Reporter: fluteflute
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.21pm, Monday, 30th March 2009]
Areas tagged with leisure=marina are currently rendered with the same colour as land. Instead they should be rendered in a blue shade (probably the same shade as the sea).
Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30877931
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: