You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: hornbydd[at]googlemail.com [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.37pm, Thursday, 28th May 2009]
Hello all,
I believe this is the place to make requests? I and others have captured the location of several cave entrances as a points (and hopefully more in the future). These are tagged correctly but they never appear in mapnik or osmarender displays. I assume they are not being rendered?
If this is the case, can someone (whoever it is) do their magic and make them display? I had a look on the openstreetmap wiki and there are a couple of suggestions for icons which I personally think look a bit crap, I reckon a simple circle would suffice and be easier to understand, much the same as Ordnance Survey do.
Duncan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: richlv[at]nakts.net [Added to the original trac issue at 4.29pm, Monday, 28th September 2009]
this one has been set to mapnik request. osmarender already renders cave entrances for a few weeks.
there's also a related request to render names for cave entrances at lower zoom levels : ticket #2325
Reporter: hornbydd[at]googlemail.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.37pm, Thursday, 28th May 2009]
Hello all,
I believe this is the place to make requests? I and others have captured the location of several cave entrances as a points (and hopefully more in the future). These are tagged correctly but they never appear in mapnik or osmarender displays. I assume they are not being rendered?
If this is the case, can someone (whoever it is) do their magic and make them display? I had a look on the openstreetmap wiki and there are a couple of suggestions for icons which I personally think look a bit crap, I reckon a simple circle would suffice and be easier to understand, much the same as Ordnance Survey do.
Duncan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: