You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Stok [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.33am, Tuesday, 2nd June 2009]
I think it would be a good idea to change the rendering of leisure=track, because tracks are not always in the form of a stadium track. For an example, look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=63.842&lon=20.3651&zoom=14&layers=0B00FTF . The track is a runners (skiing in winter) track in the forest - quite common in Sweden - consisting of several entangled loops, making the area fill look very strange. To make matters worse, the area contains several paths (most of them are not mapped yet) that are not part of the runners track, making it hard to see which paths belong to the track, and which don't.
I don't know if these designated runners/skiers tracks are common elsewhere, but this is how they typically look: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elljussp%C3%A5r . They are not just paths in the woods; they are designated exercise tracks with markings, measured length and so on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: osm[at]petschge.de [Added to the original trac issue at 5.07pm, Saturday, 18th July 2009]
If the way is closed it should have area fill anyway. and if the way is not closed, honoring area=yes might give funny results. So why would you need that?
Reporter: Stok
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.33am, Tuesday, 2nd June 2009]
I think it would be a good idea to change the rendering of leisure=track, because tracks are not always in the form of a stadium track. For an example, look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=63.842&lon=20.3651&zoom=14&layers=0B00FTF . The track is a runners (skiing in winter) track in the forest - quite common in Sweden - consisting of several entangled loops, making the area fill look very strange. To make matters worse, the area contains several paths (most of them are not mapped yet) that are not part of the runners track, making it hard to see which paths belong to the track, and which don't.
I don't know if these designated runners/skiers tracks are common elsewhere, but this is how they typically look: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elljussp%C3%A5r . They are not just paths in the woods; they are designated exercise tracks with markings, measured length and so on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: