You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: ShakespeareFan00 [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.46am, Friday, 3rd July 2009]
In checking some areas, I found some data that for whatever reason did not
have a source tag.
Would it be possible to extend Maplint so that 'tagged' ways and nodes without
a source tag could be marked in some way?
This would help (in my opinion)
i) improve the transparency of OSM data, as sources could be added (even if it's
contributor OR by physically confirming the node/way concerned)
ii) Help to get data checked, because the un-sourced items would be reviewed
either in reference to published sources or on the ground?
As part of this I would also like to suggest some kind of "reviewed=" tag that could
be added to nodes, which would show a node or way had been looked at by more than one
indvidual.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: bob[at]cakebox.net [Added to the original trac issue at 11.24pm, Saturday, 4th July 2009]
I don't think this would be very useful as most mappers don't bother to repeatedly add source to everything they add.
Also, I suspect you are talking about the maplint layer rendered by t@h (maplint can also be run separately, you'll be amazed how much more it tells you then), and it's not easy to add optional stuff there, that'd have to be a separate layer with a separate test collection or stylesheet or something. Would be ugly and resource more resources than it's worth.
Reporter: ShakespeareFan00
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.46am, Friday, 3rd July 2009]
In checking some areas, I found some data that for whatever reason did not
have a source tag.
Would it be possible to extend Maplint so that 'tagged' ways and nodes without
a source tag could be marked in some way?
This would help (in my opinion)
i) improve the transparency of OSM data, as sources could be added (even if it's
contributor OR by physically confirming the node/way concerned)
ii) Help to get data checked, because the un-sourced items would be reviewed
either in reference to published sources or on the ground?
As part of this I would also like to suggest some kind of "reviewed=" tag that could
be added to nodes, which would show a node or way had been looked at by more than one
indvidual.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: