This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Show not "big" in history #2192
Assignees
Milestone
Comments
|
Author: tom[at]compton.nu Duplicate of case #2176. Size is not really the issue anyway - the real issue is whether the changeset actually contains any edits in the area of interest or just happens to span it. |
|
Author: olek.lorenc[at]gmail.com I understand that my suggestion is not a proper fix for the problem. The proper solutions seems pretty involved. Would is be possible to implement some sort of "quick fix", such as my suggestion, to help narrow down the history to possibly relevant changes? Or do you have any other suggestions to view relevant changes? |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Reporter: olek.lorenc[at]gmail.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.22am, Tuesday, 18th August 2009]
It would be useful to be able to check a box to display all changes that are not "big" in the history tab on the OSM website to filter out very large changes and only view local changes.
For example: when I'm looking at a very undeveloped area of the map (http://www.openstreetmap.org/history?bbox=19.96147%2C49.70994%2C19.98718%2C49.7209) almost all the changes are not really relevant to the area and its very tedious to go through all the pages of changes to find the ones that are not "big" and actually relevant to the area.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: