Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

administrative are ignored? #2547

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

administrative are ignored? #2547

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: elektranox[at]gmail.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.41am, Thursday, 10th December 2009]

First of all Oldenburg (Oldb) is not yet updated (I renamed it to "Oldenburg" 10 days ago). But the main bug is, that most objects in Oldenburg got additional County tags. Here is an example:

http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=898833

It has the following additional tags, which have nothing to do with Oldenburg:

Ammerland (Type: place:region, node 240062028, 100, State, Point, 0.257954384370125 GOTO)
Wesermarsch (Type: place:region, node 240116725, 100, State, Point, 0.286923860190852 GOTO)
Bremen (Type: place:state, node 519411315, 100, State, Point, 0.492270348137169 GOTO)

Apart from this it looks like nomatim ignores the administrative for Oldenburg:
Oldenburg City Node: http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=897692
Oldenburg Relation: http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=49961554

I guess the area of the first link should be like the area of the second link.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: lonvia
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.42pm, Sunday, 18th March 2012]

Additional county in address, see #4247. Place vs. area issue, see #2573.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant