You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: elektranox[at]gmail.com [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.41am, Thursday, 10th December 2009]
First of all Oldenburg (Oldb) is not yet updated (I renamed it to "Oldenburg" 10 days ago). But the main bug is, that most objects in Oldenburg got additional County tags. Here is an example:
Reporter: elektranox[at]gmail.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.41am, Thursday, 10th December 2009]
First of all Oldenburg (Oldb) is not yet updated (I renamed it to "Oldenburg" 10 days ago). But the main bug is, that most objects in Oldenburg got additional County tags. Here is an example:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=898833
It has the following additional tags, which have nothing to do with Oldenburg:
Ammerland (Type: place:region, node 240062028, 100, State, Point, 0.257954384370125 GOTO)
Wesermarsch (Type: place:region, node 240116725, 100, State, Point, 0.286923860190852 GOTO)
Bremen (Type: place:state, node 519411315, 100, State, Point, 0.492270348137169 GOTO)
Apart from this it looks like nomatim ignores the administrative for Oldenburg:
Oldenburg City Node: http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=897692
Oldenburg Relation: http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=49961554
I guess the area of the first link should be like the area of the second link.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: