You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: GP4Flo [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.01pm, Sunday, 31st January 2010]
Currently residential and unclassified streets are being drawn with the same width as tertiary streets and much bigger than service roads which looks a bit messy at zoom level 15. In reality most unclassified streets have about the same width as service roads and residential streets only have a bit more width.
The proportions actually do look good at zoom level 14, but as soon as you go to a higher zoom level the residential and unclassified streets are way too thick.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporter: GP4Flo
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.01pm, Sunday, 31st January 2010]
Currently residential and unclassified streets are being drawn with the same width as tertiary streets and much bigger than service roads which looks a bit messy at zoom level 15. In reality most unclassified streets have about the same width as service roads and residential streets only have a bit more width.
The proportions actually do look good at zoom level 14, but as soon as you go to a higher zoom level the residential and unclassified streets are way too thick.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: