You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Pieren [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.12am, Thursday, 11th February 2010]
I'm not sure that the "Not Named" ways reported in the details view is appropriate in Nominatim. We already have other tools pointing these and I don't like to see roundabouts listed under "No Name" category since almost 90% of our roundabouts have really no names in my country (France).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: twain [Added to the original trac issue at 12.28pm, Friday, 12th February 2010]
The details view is for debugging. Says so in the documentation. Being able to see which way a point is linked to is essential - even more so for un-named ways since they will not otherwise show search results.
Author: Pieren [Added to the original trac issue at 1.07pm, Monday, 15th February 2010]
Ok, but then you shouldn't show the no_names roundabouts in the details report or the report should point out that those no_names are also declared as roundabouts because at the moment, we cannot distinguish the "normal" no_names and the buggy no_names from the list.
Reporter: Pieren
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.12am, Thursday, 11th February 2010]
I'm not sure that the "Not Named" ways reported in the details view is appropriate in Nominatim. We already have other tools pointing these and I don't like to see roundabouts listed under "No Name" category since almost 90% of our roundabouts have really no names in my country (France).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: