You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Ldp [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 9.12pm, Sunday, 7th March 2010]
Potlatch currently shows relations with type=boundary as purple, instead of the blue of a type=multipolygon relation.
However, there are a lot of type=multipolygon + boundary=administrative relations in the db. It makes sense to base the purple colour on boundary=administrative only, and ignore the relation type altogether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporter: Ldp
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 9.12pm, Sunday, 7th March 2010]
Potlatch currently shows relations with type=boundary as purple, instead of the blue of a type=multipolygon relation.
However, there are a lot of type=multipolygon + boundary=administrative relations in the db. It makes sense to base the purple colour on boundary=administrative only, and ignore the relation type altogether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: