Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

issues with rendering railway=tram and light_rail #2863

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

issues with rendering railway=tram and light_rail #2863

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: NE2
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 9.08pm, Monday, 5th April 2010]

First, I'll say that there's no clear real-world line between tram and light_rail, so they should be rendered similarly (which they are). One of the few places with justifiable usage of both is Portland, Oregon: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.5158&lon=-122.6727&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF. You can see that at some zooms tram is thinner than light_rail (which makes sense).

That said, there are some issues. This may not be an exhaustive list, but I've noticed:
[[BR]]
Street-running segments of light_rail, in other words ways tagged highway= and rail=light_rail, are only rendered as highway.
[[BR]]
*Tram bridges, in other words ways tagged railway=tram and bridge=yes, are not rendered as bridges.
[[BR]]
Both of these cases are rendered properly if the other railway tag is used, which has led some people (myself included, sadly) to tag for the renderer, taking advantage of the fact that there is no clear line between tram and light_rail.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: clockwerx
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.22pm, Sunday, 20th October 2013]

Tram bridges shifted to gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto#167

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: clockwerx
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.25pm, Sunday, 20th October 2013]

#4342

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: clockwerx
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.28pm, Sunday, 20th October 2013]

Rail issues gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto#163

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant