Pedestrian area on top of building despite use of layers #3097
Comments
Author: HolgerJeromin Same with http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.774143&lon=6.086993&zoom=19 |
Author: tom[at]acrewoods.net Ah yes, just to clarify that in the example I have the building overhangs the pedestrian area, so I don't want to cut out a chunk of the pedestrian area and the building should be drawn on top. See this photo: |
Author: Ldp Fixed a while ago. |
Author: david[at]frankieandshadow.com I don't think this is fixed, or if it is it is broken again now; or I suspect it may be somewhat random or sensitive to order in which objects are received for rendering. Robinson College's main building in Cambridge [1] is complicated. It has a set of walkways and courtyards at various levels on top of part of the building [2] with the rest of the building rising around them. I tried doing the pedestrian areas as This is puzzling because Harvey Court[3] is similar (in this case the raised pedestrian area [4] is a multipolygon though). This doesn't have area=yes. It render correctly. [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/12390499 [2] e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/143413305 |
Author: david[at]frankieandshadow.com Replying to [comment:4 david@]:
Sorry, I meant removing the layer=1. area=yes is clearly necessary. |
Author: Seoman Info: Might be connected to or double of #3966 |
Author: math1985 Is this issue still relevant? |
Author: tom[at]acrewoods.net My original example is fixed, so it doesn't look like it is still relevant. |
Author: math1985 Ok, so I'm closing this issue. |
Reporter: tom[at]acrewoods.net
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.21pm, Wednesday, 30th June 2010]
In this example there is a building (Peckham library) marked as a building and "layer=1", overlapping with a highway=pedestrian area marked with "layer=-1" just to be doubly sure. But the pedestrian area is drawn on top of the building.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.474283&lon=-0.06924&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: