[general] site relations in mapnik #3119
Comments
Author: flaimo i second that. there are a lot of site relations already. also there is a proposal for parking_spaces which makes use of relations tagged with site=parking, which would benefit greatly from that too: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking |
Author: chris66 I second this change request. site relations are very usefull but not supported in Mapnik. |
Author: Seoman Replying to [ticket:3119 dieterdreist]: See ticket #3742, too. |
Author: Radeln Replying to [comment:1 flaimo]:
+1 |
Author: gorn +1 for that here are more usecases where proper rendering of relation and most importantly entrance=main and entrance roles would greatly improve the usefulness of the map for tourist:
|
Author: math1985 How should this be reflected in the rendering, concretely? |
Author: Mateusz Konieczny If someone can provide idea how it could be rendered, feel free to re-open this on the new CartoCSS issue tracker: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto |
Reporter: dieterdreist
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 4.37pm, Tuesday, 13th July 2010]
I would really love to have site-relations integrated in the current mapnik stylesheet.
Here are some examples:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1030019
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1029540
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1026680
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: