You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: bugzilla[at]tut.by [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.30pm, Tuesday, 20th July 2010]
Hello.
I'd like addr:housename to be rendered just as name. I propose it to be rendered if no name is available. If both addr:housenumber and addr:housename are present, display the house number first, and then the house name (like in "2 Lancefield House").
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: LivingWithDragons [Added to the original trac issue at 11.20am, Friday, 3rd June 2011]
I believe this has now been implemented. But addr:housenumber appears instead of addr:housename (when both are present), I think it would be better to do it the other way round.
Author: rasher [Added to the original trac issue at 7.59pm, Tuesday, 11th October 2011]
I don't think so.
We have no way of knowing which one is more important (in some countries the name might be the important one, in others it might be the number). As such, I think both should be rendered, as the original reporter suggested. Though some sort of seperation might be nice. "Number (housename)" or perhaps even "Number\nhousename" instead of simply "Number housename" which I think could look a bit weird.
Reporter: bugzilla[at]tut.by
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.30pm, Tuesday, 20th July 2010]
Hello.
I'd like addr:housename to be rendered just as name. I propose it to be rendered if no name is available. If both addr:housenumber and addr:housename are present, display the house number first, and then the house name (like in "2 Lancefield House").
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: