You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: tko [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 8.36am, Wednesday, 28th July 2010]
It would seem when the road name just barely fits the length of the road it can completely hide the oneway arrows making navigation rather exciting. When you don't see the road names at least you know to zoom in to see it, but when you see oneway arrows all around it's not so obvious.
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.49191&lon=-0.19612&zoom=17&layers=M For example here] Nevern Square is oneway all the way; the north-south stretch is split to nortbound and southbound oneways, but it looks very much like two-way street.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: Ldp [Added to the original trac issue at 11.34am, Sunday, 1st August 2010]
How would /you/ imagine this be changed?
I don't know if there's any simple solution to this. We cannot prefer the arrows over road names, as then a large amount of road names would simply never show, even at the highest zooms.
Reporter: tko
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 8.36am, Wednesday, 28th July 2010]
It would seem when the road name just barely fits the length of the road it can completely hide the oneway arrows making navigation rather exciting. When you don't see the road names at least you know to zoom in to see it, but when you see oneway arrows all around it's not so obvious.
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.49191&lon=-0.19612&zoom=17&layers=M For example here] Nevern Square is oneway all the way; the north-south stretch is split to nortbound and southbound oneways, but it looks very much like two-way street.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: