You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Author: Ldp [Added to the original trac issue at 5.37pm, Thursday, 26th August 2010]
I thought the water_cover proposal was long dead?
I've been tagging some of these things with natural=wetland + wetland=tidalflat + tidal=yes, especially the area along beaches and waterfronts between mean high and low water lines. Example area http://osm.org/go/0Ekr6cWM- here, although resurrecting the water_cover proposal is one alternative.
Reporter: daniel.begin[at]nrcan.gc.ca
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 9.06pm, Tuesday, 24th August 2010]
Major import of canadian governement data (Canvec) with a lot of intermittent water areas.
Tagged using this proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_cover
Examples:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.2095&lon=-66.3944&zoom=12&layers=M : a large coastal bay with intermittent water (could have been tag water=tidal;surface=grass instead of just water=intermittent) delimited by coastline.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.1256&lon=-66.6402&zoom=14&layers=M : a long beach along a coastal intermittent water area (the coastline splitting landform=beach and water=intermittent areas, both having surface=sand).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: