Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

[amenity-points] Don't render guideposts as tourist information points #3298

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: augustus.kling[at]gmail.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 4.43pm, Tuesday, 19th October 2010]

The Mapnik layer on OSM currently shows the letter i for tourist information points (tagged by tourism=information). This is the correct behavior.

However if nodes are tagged by tourism=information and information=guidepost those are also rendered as i. Because the icon is usually used for information offices the rendering of guidepost is highly ambiguous and distracting.

Expected behavior (preferred): Render the guideposts with an own icon, like the Osmarender layer does.

Expected behavior (alternative): Don't render information points at all unless also tagged information=office.

Data usage according to taginfo.openstreetmap.de: tourism=information is used 68765 times. information=guidepost is used 39196 times (61.3% of usages of information key). Assuming that information=guidepost is only specified in combination with tourism=information (as stated in the wiki) this affects about 57% cases where the i is rendered. Additionally, other values of the information key also lead to a confusing rendering.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: augustus.kling[at]gmail.com
[Added to the original trac issue at 7.26pm, Wednesday, 20th October 2010]

I coincidentally found case #1961 that is very similar. Although the cases are not really duplicates, solving one should also solve the other.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: math1985
[Added to the original trac issue at 5.45pm, Monday, 14th April 2014]

This issue is now being discussed on Github:
gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto#324

Therefore, I will close the issue here.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant