You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Wynndale [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 7.15pm, Friday, 31st December 2010]
The bug icons in Potlatch 2 have serious drawbacks.
The reports are submitted though a semi-private channel, not the well-known !OpenStreetBugs mechanism.
Many of the messages are either meaningless (Enter note here...) or one point is not good enough context (The advised route is obviously not the optimal route).
Canned messages may be the same when truncated (The advise...).
Many icons disconcertingly coincide with roads.
I would like to turn these messages off and I believe new users will be less intimidated without them.
--
Andrew
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: Wynndale [Added to the original trac issue at 12.54pm, Friday, 21st January 2011]
A couple more points:
User reports of missing maximum speeds will always have the disadvantage over an internal audit of missing or badly formatted maxspeed tags that they relate to the database as it was when the road was reported and not as it is today.
When there are two reports in the same place an unreadable smudge is displayed.
Reporter: Wynndale
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 7.15pm, Friday, 31st December 2010]
The bug icons in Potlatch 2 have serious drawbacks.
The reports are submitted though a semi-private channel, not the well-known !OpenStreetBugs mechanism.
Many of the messages are either meaningless (Enter note here...) or one point is not good enough context (The advised route is obviously not the optimal route).
Canned messages may be the same when truncated (The advise...).
Many icons disconcertingly coincide with roads.
I would like to turn these messages off and I believe new users will be less intimidated without them.
--
Andrew
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: