This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
paths connect which shouldn't - layer not acted on #346
Assignees
Comments
|
Author: david[at]frankieandshadow.com How about rendering bridge Ways with much thicker borders along the highways. |
|
Author: tom[at]compton.nu I've not 100% sure where the example was pointing as labs.metacarta.com is not up these days and I think the projection has changed slightly since. The closest path I can see crossing a trunk road looks to be this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.08846&lon=0.0122&zoom=15&layers=B0FT Which looks fine to me - indeed it does not have the suggested thick border. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Reporter: david[at]frankieandshadow.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 8.09pm, Wednesday, 6th December 2006]
see http://labs.metacarta.com/osm/lat=6810756.70831&lon=17027.77785&zoom=15&layers=B
The path crossing the trunk road in the middle is a bridge. It's marked bridge=yes, layer=1. Even if bridge isn't rendered, the fact that itis layer=1 means that the road and bridge shouldn't connect. Also there's no connecting node, so again, they shouldn't connect (without the layer or acting on bridge, that might mean they get rendered in the wrong order, but they shouldn't connect).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: