Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

displaced labes for lakes #3475

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

displaced labes for lakes #3475

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@openstreetmap-trac
Labels
Component: mapnik Priority: major Resolution: fixed Type: defect

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: !i!
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.02am, Saturday, 22nd January 2011]

Hi, on long and very winded lakes, the label might be on land beside the lake.

For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.64285&lon=11.32882&zoom=15
@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac self-assigned this Jul 23, 2021
@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: Ldp
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.35pm, Wednesday, 16th March 2011]

This is a known issue, and there are multiple tickets for this.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: ghia
[Added to the original trac issue at 6.04am, Friday, 28th October 2011]

Here is another one (below the marker).
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.005&mlon=4.55204&zoom=16&layers=M

Also cyclemap has the same defect.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.005&mlon=4.55214&zoom=16&layers=C

Osmarender puts this at a correct location.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.003&mlon=4.55364&zoom=16&layers=O
Weird is that it does not show at all at zoom level 15, where as 14, 16 and up does (maybe due to some style rule?).

Maybe the algoritmes for the label placement in both systems should be compared to find out what is wrong with the Mapnik calculation.

Regards,
Gerard

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac

Labels
Component: mapnik Priority: major Resolution: fixed Type: defect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@openstreetmap-trac