Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

natural=scrub covers landuse=forest #3501

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

natural=scrub covers landuse=forest #3501

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: dieterdreist
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.42am, Tuesday, 1st February 2011]

I guess these "a covers b"-tickets are not very welcome, because you can't make it ever right for everyone. In this case I'd still dare to speak about a problem, because you can indeed have forests with scrub below, which should IMHO be rendered as forests (they are dominating) but you can't have scrub and forest at the same time and ignore the forest (there is no forest inside scrub that is not forest).

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: Ldp
[Added to the original trac issue at 1.46pm, Thursday, 17th March 2011]

Not sure what to do. This is a really contrived situation. Wouldn't these areas just be considered forest?

PS: Next time, please include a link to your problem area.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant