You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Michael Zajac [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 7.53pm, Wednesday, 6th April 2011]
Render other service=* types in a lighter weight, just like service=spur/siding/yard. There could be more valid service types such as service=crossover, service=interchange, and potentially others. There's also the possibility of finer-grained classification, e.g., different tracks within a yard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(Anyone know a way to search for railway=rail AND service=* ?)
Different types of service track within a yard could be the lead/drill track, car sorting/switching, gravity hump, car storage, transfer, locomotive storage, turnaround, wye, and turntable, workshop/maintenance, loading/transloading, etc. (Caveat: I'm no expert, and Wikipedia's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_yard Rail Yard] is sparse.)
Author: Ldp [Added to the original trac issue at 6.29pm, Saturday, 9th April 2011]
I'm not convinced by the numbers, yet. The way I see it, all yard tracks not part of a main line going through are all service=yard. If you want to ambiguate that further, introduce a yard=* tagging. By deviating from the simple service=yard tagging, you're making life a lot more difficult for data users. The mapnik map is just one of those data users.
Definately don't want to show mapping errors like "spur;yard".
How one can even consider high_speed a service=*, I don't know. :)
Author: math1985 [Added to the original trac issue at 4.07pm, Monday, 19th May 2014]
There does seem to be not much demand for this, given both the numbers and the lack of discussion about/requests for particular service values. I will therefore close this issue as wontfix.
Reporter: Michael Zajac
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 7.53pm, Wednesday, 6th April 2011]
Render other service=* types in a lighter weight, just like service=spur/siding/yard. There could be more valid service types such as service=crossover, service=interchange, and potentially others. There's also the possibility of finer-grained classification, e.g., different tracks within a yard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: