You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: TheFive [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 3.38pm, Sunday, 15th May 2011]
sending private messages is a nice feature for communication direct during map development. The file, sort and search possibilities of the openstreetmap mail clients aren't so useful as in my standard mail program i use.
So it would be nice to have a feature, that i can configure in my personal preferences to send all private messages from www.openstreetmap.org BCC to my mail address.
Than i can sort order move my mails like i use to do with all my other mails.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: TheFive [Added to the original trac issue at 7.46am, Monday, 16th May 2011]
BCC is possibly not the best solution, as this will publish the TO address to the sender.
May be a separate Mail with an html link to whom it was sent and a link to the mail in www.openstreetmap.org is necessary.
The mail address publishing method differs a little bit from wiki.openstreetmap.org. Here the sender publishes his email address when sending private messages.
Reporter: TheFive
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 3.38pm, Sunday, 15th May 2011]
sending private messages is a nice feature for communication direct during map development. The file, sort and search possibilities of the openstreetmap mail clients aren't so useful as in my standard mail program i use.
So it would be nice to have a feature, that i can configure in my personal preferences to send all private messages from www.openstreetmap.org BCC to my mail address.
Than i can sort order move my mails like i use to do with all my other mails.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: