Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

Searching Sankt Andreasberg leads to incorrect entry #3790

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Searching Sankt Andreasberg leads to incorrect entry #3790

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@openstreetmap-trac
Labels
Component: nominatim Priority: minor Resolution: invalid Type: defect

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: Ogmios
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.52pm, Saturday, 28th May 2011]

When I use the OSM search engine to search "Sankt Andreasberg" it shows "Sankt Andreasberg, Goslar, Eichsfeld, Niedersachsen (Landmasse), Deutschland, Europa". This city is next to Eichsfeld but not part of Eichsfeld. I coulnd find why it shows Eichsfeld in the string. Maybe its a bug.
@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac self-assigned this Jul 23, 2021
@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: lonvia
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.22am, Saturday, 14th July 2012]

This is data error that has been fixed in the meantime. Somebody added proper boundaries for Eichsfeld.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac

Labels
Component: nominatim Priority: minor Resolution: invalid Type: defect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@openstreetmap-trac