You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Now you might say "why map such an obscure feature?". The good thing is that gaging stations are mostly far from anything else. They add interest to wilderness areas and blank areas on the map.
Author: bryce2[at]obviously.com [Added to the original trac issue at 2.53pm, Wednesday, 19th October 2011]
In remote areas the gauging stations may well be the only manmade feature. As such they are very useful on a generic map. The stations have been a staple on topographic maps for decades.
I see every reason to display this feature type at high zoom levels. The clutter effect is minimal.
Author: math1985 [Added to the original trac issue at 1.10am, Friday, 23rd May 2014]
I also agree that this icon would be of limited use. I will therefore close this issue as wontfix. If you still disagree, feel free to reopen the issue at the new issue tracker at https://github.com/gravitystorm /openstreetmap-carto/ .
Reporter: bryce2[at]obviously.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 11.18am, Monday, 22nd August 2011]
A standard topographic map symbol is for a gaging station:
http://egsc.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/booklets/symbols/topomapsymbols.pdf
Now you might say "why map such an obscure feature?". The good thing is that gaging stations are mostly far from anything else. They add interest to wilderness areas and blank areas on the map.
Thus there's no issue of clutter.
The tag is:
node['tag']['man_made'] = 'monitoring_station'
node['tag']['monitoring:river_level'] = 'yes'
I'd say the single symbol from usgs works well for all monitoring stations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: