Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

Potlatch 2 fails razed highways #4260

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Potlatch 2 fails razed highways #4260

openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
@openstreetmap-trac
Labels
Component: potlatch2 Priority: minor Resolution: wontfix Type: defect

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: Will Pittenger
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.37pm, Friday, 2nd March 2012]

All I see in the case of [http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/134765904 way 134765904] is the one-way arrows. Perhaps it could be draw normally with red X marks on it.
@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac self-assigned this Jul 23, 2021
@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: stevage
[Added to the original trac issue at 4.15am, Saturday, 3rd March 2012]

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=razed

235 uses only. And I'm not sure that it absolutely would have to be shown in the P2 stylesheet anyway.

wontfix?

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: stevage
[Added to the original trac issue at 4.16am, Saturday, 3rd March 2012]

P2 doesn't support any construction=/proposed=. Those tags are a real PITA for the current map_features implementation.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: stevage
[Added to the original trac issue at 4.17am, Saturday, 3rd March 2012]

(Sorry, comment on wrong tag - and I can't delete it).

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: Richard
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.05pm, Wednesday, 7th March 2012]

As per Steve's reason.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@openstreetmap-trac openstreetmap-trac

Labels
Component: potlatch2 Priority: minor Resolution: wontfix Type: defect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@openstreetmap-trac