You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Seoman [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.53am, Monday, 2nd April 2012]
Please make sure there is a minimum number of oneway arrows visible (on high zoom levels).
E.g. [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.431769&lon=6.766953&zoom=18&layers=M here] on the oneway street "Vom-Rath-Strae" there is only one arrow at the north end that can be overlooked easily.
In high zoom levels (17,18) there is enough space for a(n) additional arrows(s) e.g. at the south end.[[BR]]
Alternatively you may consider drawing a more transparent arrow under the street name - but only if there is not enough space for the previous solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporter: Seoman
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.53am, Monday, 2nd April 2012]
Please make sure there is a minimum number of oneway arrows visible (on high zoom levels).
E.g. [http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.431769&lon=6.766953&zoom=18&layers=M here] on the oneway street "Vom-Rath-Strae" there is only one arrow at the north end that can be overlooked easily.
In high zoom levels (17,18) there is enough space for a(n) additional arrows(s) e.g. at the south end.[[BR]]
Alternatively you may consider drawing a more transparent arrow under the street name - but only if there is not enough space for the previous solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: