You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Author: karl[at]huftis.org [Added to the original trac issue at 8.41pm, Thursday, 24th May 2012]
I agree. I found the current behaviour very confusing. For example, the changeset changing version 2 to 3 at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1426281643/history lead me to think the person had broken the wikipedia tag, not fixing it.
Reporter: dieterdreist
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.44am, Friday, 20th April 2012]
E.g. if there is an object tagged like this:
the tags on the browse page http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/45154 will show the tag like this:
As this view is mainly intended for mappers it would be better to show them all tags in unaltered form without any "beautifying".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: