You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: namuori [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.18pm, Sunday, 16th September 2012]
After fixing the issue that was ticket #4557, I'm now noticing that Nominatim is picking the wrong, adjacent province for the addresses for many of the cities in Gyeonggi-do (Gyeonggi Province). Here are a few examples.
Author: lonvia [Added to the original trac issue at 10.36am, Sunday, 23rd September 2012]
This is caused by bug #4550, already fixed in code. It will be deployed with the next reimport in a few weeks.
NB: those cities appear in the county relation with role 'label'. This sounds like it is incorrect. I presume that the county and the city are not the same but that the city is the administrative centre of the county. In that case the role should be 'admin_centre'. (Incidentally, changing this will also work around this bug.)
Reporter: namuori
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 12.18pm, Sunday, 16th September 2012]
After fixing the issue that was ticket #4557, I'm now noticing that Nominatim is picking the wrong, adjacent province for the addresses for many of the cities in Gyeonggi-do (Gyeonggi Province). Here are a few examples.
Dongducheon:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=3977812
This city is well within Gyeonggi-do's border, yet it's being listed under Gangwon-do.
Paju:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=2688795
This one simply doesn't have any province assigned to it.
Anseong:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=3226407
This one shows up to be under Chungcheongbuk-do.
What's interesting to note is that these nodes are linked to admin borders, and these properly list them under Gyeonggi-do:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=2486970788
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=2486970801
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=2486970785
I'm suspecting that Gyeonggi-do node...
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=2487216741
...is somehow not properly assigned to the cities. I've even explicitly put is_in tags in the city nodes as FAQ suggested, but it didn't do any good.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: