Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

When addr:place is given, the object should not be automatically associated to a street #4698

Closed
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: ajank
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 7.41am, Saturday, 24th November 2012]

In many countries, small villages do not have street names, and the addresses are formed by combining the village name itself with a house number. According to OSM wiki, the "part of address, which is not related to street, but to some territorial zone, linear object, node or some abstract object" should be put under addr:place tag.

An example house, bearing the postal address "Pomocnia 4, 06-121 Pomocnia", is tagged as follows: addr:housenumber = 4 + addr:place = Pomocnia + addr:city = Pomocnia + addr:postcode = 06-121: http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details?osmtype=W&osmid=185887900.

Apparently Nominatim desperately tried to associate the object with any named street. In this case, the nearest one occurred to be a tertiary road in the neighbouring village, Piskornia Dua. Unfortunately there is no way of explicitly saying that there is no street name in the address (like addr:street = NULL).

In my opinion, if an object has the addr:place tag, Nominatim should refrain from automatically associating it to a nearest named street, and handle the value of addr:place like an abstract street name. Such a small change in the algorithm would be a huge improvement to address handling in rural areas worldwide.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: lonvia
[Added to the original trac issue at 5.09pm, Sunday, 25th November 2012]

Duplicate of #3425

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant