Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

Remove parentage of roads, etc., from place nodes, when node is linked to boundary relation #4757

Open
openstreetmap-trac opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link

Reporter: happy5214
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 9.03am, Thursday, 24th January 2013]

When a place node is linked to a boundary relation, the node is still listed as the parent of roads outside the extent of said relation. Ideally, if the node is linked as such, it should not be the parent of anything.

Example: Cutler, California has a relation [http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=3677960328 here]. (see note 1) It is linked to [http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=3676580923 this node]. However, the node is the parent of [http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=3678207121 this road], which should instead be directly under Tulare County.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Alexander

Note 1: Recently developed US consensus is to tag CDP boundaries, such as Cutler, with boundary=census, not boundary=administrative.

@openstreetmap-trac
Copy link
Author

Author: twain
[Added to the original trac issue at 12.38pm, Thursday, 24th January 2013]

It seems linked places are not being deleted from location_area_large_(partition) tables

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant