You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: besong [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 7.56pm, Friday, 22nd March 2013]
A way with
railway=platform
tunnel=yes
is just rendered as without tunnel, but but the railway with railway=rail tunnel=yes is rendered just fine. Not cruicial, maybe underground mapping is not the premier goal of osm, but would be pretty I think.
Reporter: besong
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 7.56pm, Friday, 22nd March 2013]
A way with
is just rendered as without tunnel, but but the railway with
railway=rail tunnel=yes
is rendered just fine. Not cruicial, maybe underground mapping is not the premier goal of osm, but would be pretty I think.Here an example of 2013-03-23, south platform with tunnel=1, with no difference
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.12014&lon=16.564408&zoom=18&layers=M
Hello and goodbye and thanks for all the rendering!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: