You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Author: lonvia [Added to the original trac issue at 2.33pm, Monday, 6th May 2013]
Your relation is not correctly closed, you can see that on [http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2911422 the browse page for the relation]. There are two dangling ends to the boundary area. Once you have removed them, Harleshausen should be indexed correctly from the relation.
Reporter: AnSc_de
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.43am, Monday, 6th May 2013]
In Potlatch I see the way I created and can also see the relation to where it belongs.
In the Nominatim search both do not appear.[[BR]]
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details?osmtype=W&osmid=220011462
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details?osmtype=R&osmid=2911422
But a second way I created appears:[[BR]]
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details?osmtype=W&osmid=219903517
I can see no difference between the both ways and I think because of some problems with the one way the relation also does not appear.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: