You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Grillo [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.33pm, Sunday, 11th August 2013]
Yesterday I wanted to edit http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/432463849 which had the wrong place value. To do that I had to open ID (or another editor). This is unneccesarily burdensome since it didn't involve any change of coordinates.
It should be possible to edit, add and remove values for nodes, ways and relations with the browse interface, without having to open a map editor, kind of like Wikidata works, just as long as no coordinates are changed.
I don't know if this is possible to implement or if it has been asked before, but I'm sure that I'm not the only one who has wanted to do edits like this in a more streamlined fashion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In general, editors apply various validation rules to check consistency of the data these days. Direct changes bypassing any validations is only suitable for expert users.
Reporter: Grillo
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 2.33pm, Sunday, 11th August 2013]
Yesterday I wanted to edit http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/432463849 which had the wrong place value. To do that I had to open ID (or another editor). This is unneccesarily burdensome since it didn't involve any change of coordinates.
It should be possible to edit, add and remove values for nodes, ways and relations with the browse interface, without having to open a map editor, kind of like Wikidata works, just as long as no coordinates are changed.
I don't know if this is possible to implement or if it has been asked before, but I'm sure that I'm not the only one who has wanted to do edits like this in a more streamlined fashion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: