Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #5062, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 8, 2013, 1:48:47 PM (5 years ago)
Author:
aseerel4c26
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #5062, comment 2

    initial v1  
    11yes, I understand why it is not listed. But the description makes one think that the listed tags are all tags of the changeset.
    22
    3 "Most users" and "should not have to care" also means to make it harder for those who actually want to understand. This is also a problem for iD which also follows this concept of  "should not have to care". For that reason some users think there is an area data type in the osm data and cannot understand that simply connecting a way's ends (and maybe some relevant tags) has the same effect. ;-)
     3"Most users" and "should not have to care" also means to make it harder for those who actually want to understand. This is also a problem for iD which also follows this concept of  "should not have to care". For that reason some [https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/25707/area-creation-in-id-continuous-addition-of-points-drops-how-to-continue users] [https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/27594/can-you-change-a-closed-line-into-an-area think] there is an area data type in the osm data and cannot understand that simply connecting a way's ends (and maybe some relevant tags) has the same effect. ;-)
    44
    55"(Additional) tags" would be another option for the heading. Yes, or ignoring/accepting that in-correctness.