You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: eladner [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 5.39am, Monday, 9th December 2013]
Something related to the rendering of natural=bay seems to have changed in the last month or so.
See [http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/30.4017/-88.8503]. There should be water following that county border towards the north west.
I checked the tagging on the multipolygon and it appears correct. Also checked the xml include file referenced in #1795 and it appears untouched for many months. Something else may be overriding it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporter: eladner
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 5.39am, Monday, 9th December 2013]
Something related to the rendering of natural=bay seems to have changed in the last month or so.
See [http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/30.4017/-88.8503]. There should be water following that county border towards the north west.
I checked the tagging on the multipolygon and it appears correct. Also checked the xml include file referenced in #1795 and it appears untouched for many months. Something else may be overriding it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: