You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: andreas.binder[at]itelio.de [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.41am, Tuesday, 28th January 2014]
Hi,
A mapper changed the name of the osm multipolygon http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1919310 to "Kinderhaus Aising - Kinderkrippe" on 4th december. This name was wrong and was corrected/removed on 6th december.
When searching in Nomination for "10 Sedanstrae rosenheim" the building is found and the old multipolygonname "Kinderhaus Aising - Kinderkrippe" is shown. http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=98190258 shows that nomination uses the multipolygon version from 4th december. Does we have to wait (we are waiting now for more than one month) or is something wrong?
Regards, Andreas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Author: lonvia [Added to the original trac issue at 10.25pm, Tuesday, 28th January 2014]
Looks like an update bug where going from named landuse to nameless landuse does not remove the object properly from the database. Needs some closer looking into the code. For the moment I've deleted the relation from the live database.
Reporter: andreas.binder[at]itelio.de
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 10.41am, Tuesday, 28th January 2014]
Hi,
A mapper changed the name of the osm multipolygon http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1919310 to "Kinderhaus Aising - Kinderkrippe" on 4th december. This name was wrong and was corrected/removed on 6th december.
When searching in Nomination for "10 Sedanstrae rosenheim" the building is found and the old multipolygonname "Kinderhaus Aising - Kinderkrippe" is shown.
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=98190258 shows that nomination uses the multipolygon version from 4th december. Does we have to wait (we are waiting now for more than one month) or is something wrong?
Regards, Andreas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: