You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
Reporter: Sebastian[at]SSpaeth.de [Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.04pm, Sunday, 2nd September 2007]
From David Earle via Mailing list:
I'm finding it hard to tell the difference between service roads and residential/unclassified roads on the new osmarender. I see they are very slightly narrower, but it is almost indistinguishable. How about a slight further narrowing and lighter shade of grey for the casement at z17, and significantly narrower at 16 and above? The width is causing particular problems for service roads within car parks - the car park area can be almost obliterated by the road at z16 and above e.g. http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.08471216072612&lon=0.01839336648563927&zoom=16&layers=B000F000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reporter: Sebastian[at]SSpaeth.de
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 1.04pm, Sunday, 2nd September 2007]
From David Earle via Mailing list:
I'm finding it hard to tell the difference between service roads and residential/unclassified roads on the new osmarender. I see they are very slightly narrower, but it is almost indistinguishable. How about a slight further narrowing and lighter shade of grey for the casement at z17, and significantly narrower at 16 and above? The width is causing particular problems for service roads within car parks - the car park area can be almost obliterated by the road at z16 and above e.g.
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=52.08471216072612&lon=0.01839336648563927&zoom=16&layers=B000F000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: